<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — Packaging]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;fid=98&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2026-04-11T09:23:32Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/index.php</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Flatpak issues]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=1177&amp;action=new" />
			<summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,<br />Currently, Hyperbola doesn&#039;t include Flatpak for the following reason:<br />&gt; The project itself would bring up another way to distribute software, but as there is no source available without non-free packages and also no restriction to be implemented: Possible non-free dependencies and software would be then provided direct on the system.<br /><a href="https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:philosophy:incompatible_packages#:~:text=Application%20sandboxing%20and%20distribution%20framework">https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id … 0framework</a><br />But that&#039;s wrong, the Flathub, the main Flatpaks packages repertory indicate that it is possible to configure Flatpak with &quot;flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists --subset=verified_floss flathub-verified-floss <a href="https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo">https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo&quot;</a> so it only include FLOSS softwares. </p><p>It is not perfect as a few softwares such as Only Office are marked as free even if they are not. However, a lot of FLOSS softwares are now using only Flapak as an official way to install them.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[impromptux]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=764</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-11T09:23:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=1177&amp;action=new</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
