<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[HyperForum — Support of capable hardware]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=1113</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1113&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Support of capable hardware.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Support of capable hardware]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8487#p8487</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A high end 32 bit computer can still run LibreOffice and tons of software.&nbsp; On 64 bits, they already began deprecating 32 bit systems, starting with OpenJDK. Blindly, GNU stopped giving support to GCJ with GCC7 and the GNU Classpath. And with JamVM 2.0 and Jikes/GCJ you can cover zillions of internal Java software&nbsp; made internally for companies, often with no license at all, but now tons of internal propietary enterprise software can only *properly* run, paradoxically, with legacy&nbsp; OpenJDK releases or JamVM with the GNU Classpath (Java 1.4/1.6).&nbsp; <a href="https://openjdk.org/jeps/501">https://openjdk.org/jeps/501</a>&nbsp; Also, the scale to bootstrap a proper JDK from sources it&#039;s exponential:&nbsp; <a href="https://bootstrappable.org/projects/jvm-languages.html">https://bootstrappable.org/projects/jvm-languages.html</a>&nbsp; Now compare it with our bundled Icon language, Unicon, which can do tons of stuff with a base system with very limited resources; the code will run fine on foreign systems too once being recompiled and even a Pentium III might be enough to run it.&nbsp; Sample function/program list:&nbsp; <a href="https://unicon.sourceforge.io/up/functions.html">https://unicon.sourceforge.io/up/functions.html</a>&nbsp; When Unicon gets XFT support it might perfectly work for the 90% of the needs of any office environment as it already supports tecnologies like using POSIX, SQLite, plots and it even has 3D figures&#039; support.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (anthk)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8487#p8487</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Support of capable hardware]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8479#p8479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The price paid for having more &quot;professional&quot; support is that only newer towards newest hardware-abstraction layers are supported. Hyperbola has not this orientation and is not going anywhere else. The so-called &quot;simplification&quot; without support for 16bit and 32bit instructions is also a price that those systems failing that orient only on the newest developments.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8479#p8479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Support of capable hardware]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8478#p8478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a very capable T400s, with a SP9600 CPU, 8GB mem and SSD drive.&nbsp; This particular computer have been running Devuan the last few years quiet smoothly. Last week I needed a computer for a professional test of a RPM package, so I flashed a RedHat derivative on a usbDrive. To my surprise, I got a &#039;CPU deprecated&#039; message. Apparently this will not be easy anymore [<a href="https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7066628">https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7066628</a>], my &#039;quiet capable&#039; CPU is marked deprecated. Now I see other big and small (including Arch-Linux) distributions discussing the switch to x86_64v3.<br />All free laptops use x86_64v1, so I guess Libre-Distributions will provide support longer, and we will have i686 anyhow. But it kind of a pity see capable hardware loosing support. Anyhow, I am happy to see Hyperbola statements about supporting i686 and x86_64 (v1 I guess).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bemc)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8478#p8478</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
