<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[HyperForum — About architectures: is x86 the only choice?]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=1195</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1195&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in About architectures: is x86 the only choice?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: About architectures: is x86 the only choice?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8953#p8953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, therefore we will not add any other architecture and the ones left in HyperBK for HyperbolaBSD are there for possible future developments, pure experimental. The major focus stays x86. Thread closed, thanks for the input bemc.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8953#p8953</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: About architectures: is x86 the only choice?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8952#p8952</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Lemote had their days, not available anymore. It makes little sense to put resources on the support of such a niche.<br />Even ARM: weeks ago I was listening Gaël Duval talking about the amount of resources he needs to support ARM devices comparing to x86.<br />Even MNT needs to deliver blobs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bemc)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8952#p8952</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: About architectures: is x86 the only choice?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8951#p8951</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Do you relate to Hyperbola? If so: We do not offer any other architecture as we do not have neither the resources (money included) nor the people and help doing so. It is impossible to manage many architectures and unrealistic as small system-project. Besides: There is no real libre CPU-architecture and always some kind of cave-eat to accept. So x86-architecture is the best to stick on as there are Coreboot and derivates, further firmware-projects. In the end there is always some kind of an issue. But there is also a formula: The newer it gets the more problematic it will be.</p><p>We can surely debate on and off, but searching endless for the &quot;most libre hardware&quot; is not helping anyone further when the software is that much of problematic already and free software have many issues and foul compromises already.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8951#p8951</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[About architectures: is x86 the only choice?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8949#p8949</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>X86 is not a libre-friendly standard. Recent i686/x86_64 CPUs mostly have nonfree firmware like Intel IME.</p><p><a href="https://www.loongson.cn/system/loongarch">LoongArch</a> is an alternative choice to x86. It is a clean, libre-friendly RISC architecture with good performance.</p><p>It has no nonfree firmware shipped by the CPU by default, and the official PMON and UEFI are both libre.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Allen123456hello)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=8949#p8949</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
