About Conic: It's my own small project to learn about how an operating system works at first, then I found Hyperbola is my ideal opetating system. But I want to use GNU operating system with a more secure kernel, so I plan to keep working on Conic. It's not a fork of Hyperbola.

thanks for your idea and offering. But before thinking that way: You are already maintaining omegathon. Do you think this is a sustainable path when going into more parts? I would recommend first to sustain possible projects so you can surely help Hyperbola the same as python is clearly not sustainable.

Furthermore I ask friendly about more information about that repositories here:

https://codeberg.org/Allen123456hello/conic-wiki
https://codeberg.org/Allen123456hello/conic-dinit-rc
https://codeberg.org/Allen123456hello/conic-dinit-rc

I find it irritating to support on the one side Hyperbola, Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre and HyperbolaBSD. On the other side demonstrating very open that you plan doing an own project. That is not very logic and also kind of strange. Hyperbola is free software surely. But forking with using than the work we have done here later on? Also that is a point of trust, Allen123456hello. You can always get in touch with us, asking further. Just forking without noting and we later discover this, likewise now, is not so friendly.

I want to help with HyperbolaBSD's development because I want to support the whole free software community. Even FSF now hasn't a clear stance on free software.