<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — AppArmor]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=301&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2022-06-18T19:06:26Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=301</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: AppArmor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=4675#p4675" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Feel invited if you think to include it for BSD-systems for example. Help is always welcome here. But besides all that: We don&#039;t support PAM and inclusion of PAM also, while AppArmor is using that. We won&#039;t stay at GNU/Linux: <a href="https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap/">https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announc … d-roadmap/</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-06-18T19:06:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=4675#p4675</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: AppArmor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=4673#p4673" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi There,</p><p>MAC Apparmor is essential to secure packages otherwise packages vulnerabilities/0 days can breach to the system without proper privilege limitation or sandboxing.</p><p>So not shipping apparmor/apparmor profiles let alone activating them by default thats for surely reduction to the security of the system.</p><p>Unless that im not aware of a project doing better job than apparmor for the packages.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[whombola]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-06-18T17:20:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=4673#p4673</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: AppArmor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1380#p1380" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>burhen42 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m wondering if AppArmor is ever going to be part of the Hyperbola repositories.<br />I reckon it would be of great help to keeping the OS secure, in tandem with Firejail and other security apps.</p></blockquote></div><p>I dunno, I forget why, but I feel like there was a reason it wasn&#039;t secure and therefore not added. Although I use ufw or gufw anyways as my firewall.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[zapper]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=117</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-05T17:54:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1380#p1380</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[AppArmor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m wondering if AppArmor is ever going to be part of the Hyperbola repositories.<br />I reckon it would be of great help to keeping the OS secure, in tandem with Firejail and other security apps.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[burhen42]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-12-05T13:52:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
