<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — [proposal] Replace KDE Plasma with Trinity?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=322&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2020-01-05T02:11:35Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=322</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [proposal] Replace KDE Plasma with Trinity?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1633#p1633" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, seems not so easy, but perhaps having a closer look onto mitigation of D-Bus.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-01-05T02:11:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1633#p1633</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: [proposal] Replace KDE Plasma with Trinity?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1632#p1632" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>throgh wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello together,</p><p>I wish everyone a happy new year and I hope the first hours of 2020 were okay for everybody. Coming up is more a question to the community and the developers: Wouldn&#039;t it be better to remove KDE Plasma and replace it with the <a href="http://www.trinitydesktop.org/index.php">Trinity Desktop Environment</a>? The reasoning behind is that Qt is transforming more and more to just &quot;Open-Source&quot;-only framework. Incoming with this also the concurrent pragmatism as using proprietary components.</p><p>What I <strong>don&#039;t think of</strong>: Removin all Qt-applications at all. The same as with <a href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=293">Gnome 3</a>, it would be better having the plasma-desktop removed as both of the environments have a questionable future in common and the work to be done getting them free of proprietary services would be better done elsewhere.</p><p>What I <strong>think of</strong>: Intgeration of <strong>Trinity Desktop Environment</strong> as meta-package for some future release and doing before a research if there are not just also proprietary dependencies. As I had some very positive insights in the environment it would be perhaps a good alternative?</p><p>What are your thoughts about it?</p></blockquote></div><p>I think probably not, unless dbus can be worked out of it. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/hmm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="hmm" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[zapper]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=117</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-01-05T01:26:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1632#p1632</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[proposal] Replace KDE Plasma with Trinity?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1617#p1617" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello together,</p><p>I wish everyone a happy new year and I hope the first hours of 2020 were okay for everybody. Coming up is more a question to the community and the developers: Wouldn&#039;t it be better to remove KDE Plasma and replace it with the <a href="http://www.trinitydesktop.org/index.php">Trinity Desktop Environment</a>? The reasoning behind is that Qt is transforming more and more to just &quot;Open-Source&quot;-only framework. Incoming with this also the concurrent pragmatism as using proprietary components.</p><p>What I <strong>don&#039;t think of</strong>: Removin all Qt-applications at all. The same as with <a href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=293">Gnome 3</a>, it would be better having the plasma-desktop removed as both of the environments have a questionable future in common and the work to be done getting them free of proprietary services would be better done elsewhere.</p><p>What I <strong>think of</strong>: Intgeration of <strong>Trinity Desktop Environment</strong> as meta-package for some future release and doing before a research if there are not just also proprietary dependencies. As I had some very positive insights in the environment it would be perhaps a good alternative?</p><p>What are your thoughts about it?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-01-01T11:37:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=1617#p1617</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
