<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=382&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2020-06-15T19:29:21Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=382</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2038#p2038" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Worked quite well so far, but I&#039;m working on that also again within the upcoming time. Xfce is okay, but I want to tryout IceWM also or even better quite far more simplified desktop-environments. Even dbus should not be used! <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>It&#039;s a pity that LXDE is not ported onto OpenBSD for now.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-15T19:29:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2038#p2038</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2037#p2037" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>And a little bit off topic, I have seen you tried OpenBSD on libreboot some time ago and you got xfce to work, but with some X problems. Any news on that?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[i.ortega]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-15T19:04:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2037#p2037</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2036#p2036" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s wait what the team says. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> It was just my personal opinion as user as I see problems upcoming with some major packages. But yes, creating a free port-tree? Why not? But let&#039;s not forget: Hyperbola is depending on us as community. So we can also help creating this what you described.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-15T17:55:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2036#p2036</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2035#p2035" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>So it is going to keep the current release model. That&#039;s fine. I thought you would maybe sync with OpenBSD&#039;s ports and just remove the non-free software, but if you are going to keep the LTS model I guess that&#039;s not the case.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[i.ortega]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-15T17:24:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2035#p2035</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2033#p2033" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Personal perspective: What do you exactly mean with &quot;old software&quot;? The major problem - even with free software and projects these days - is the upcoming pragmatism and with it the integration of unfree services into originated free software itself. Need of an example? Just have a look onto <strong>gnome-online-accounts</strong> with the integration of proprietary services. So when using a ports-tree the major problem stays: What about freedom, privacy and security itself? And removing those interfaces version by version is very hard and unneeded work.</p><p>So those packages and software is in some way older, but what should be reasonable? Searching for the newest, bleeding-edge package? Well, this is long-time-support as mentioned <a href="https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=:en:start">here</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-15T16:49:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2033#p2033</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperbolaBSD release model]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2032#p2032" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>All these months I have assumed HyperbolaBSD would use a OpenBSD-like release model, a new release every X months and pretty new software. However, today I have been thinking about it and I prefer to ask it here. Is Hyperbola going to keep the current release model where software is pretty old compared OpenBSD or is it going to have a ports tree like other BSDs do with pretty new software and pre-built binaries available?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[i.ortega]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-14T22:47:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2032#p2032</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
