<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[HyperForum — Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=433</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=433&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2022 11:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5306#p5306</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not enough information therefore found. When you have more, please share it. Nevertheless: Those additions would take more time we better invest in the other parts for HyperbolaBSD. But please also note: Open another topic especially about that. The question was more or answered here within the thread as we won&#039;t support gnome-shell. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2022 11:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5306#p5306</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5305#p5305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is seatd, a light-weight substitute for elogind, sufficiently portable? I only see support for FreeBSD and Linux.Velox, a wayland compositor from Oasis (non-gnu) Linux, has been ported to NetBSD; but I do not know about the situation on OpenBSD.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (schilling.klaus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5305#p5305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2504#p2504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>@Emulatorman</p><p>How do you decide which versions of packages to have? Since hyperbola is LTS, I guess the latest versions would not be appropriate for it.</p><p>Say, there&#039;s python-cryptography versions from last 2.3 which hyperbola had in v0.3 to latest 3.2.1 . How do you decide which python-cryptography to have?</p></blockquote></div><p>Milky Way v0.4 is based on the Debian&#039;s BullsEye generation. We made a modification in the development releases, you can see <a href="https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:releases#development_releases">here</a> for further details.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (emulatorman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2504#p2504</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2498#p2498</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Emulatorman</p><p>How do you decide which versions of packages to have? Since hyperbola is LTS, I guess the latest versions would not be appropriate for it.</p><p>Say, there&#039;s python-cryptography versions from last 2.3 which hyperbola had in v0.3 to latest 3.2.1 . How do you decide which python-cryptography to have?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sagaracharya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2498#p2498</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2477#p2477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Emulatorman wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>We won&#039;t support GNOME or wayland in the next version (v0.4) because we are removing all GNU/Linux-based desktop frameworks (ConsoleKit, PolicyKit, D-Bus, systemd, elogind, etc..). Our focus is become a lightweight distro and a BSD descendant operating system (HyperbolaBSD), so our packages in that version will be migrated to BSD-based ones to ease the migration from GNU/Linux to HyperbolaBSD.</p></blockquote></div><p>This is the best distro ever <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (the_hype)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2477#p2477</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2446#p2446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Emulatorman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>dikasp2 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>how about lxde or xfce desktop, is there any possibilities to port them into hyperbola 0.4 ?</p></blockquote></div><p>As far as I know, XFCE forces Polkit and needs at least ConsoleKit to make work while i&#039;m not sure about LXDE.</p></blockquote></div><p>Had done short search for getting away from those dependencies. Found the following here in the Gentoo-Wiki (<a href="https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/LXDE">https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/LXDE</a>):</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>Users however who dislike all those dependencies (dbus, polkit, consolekit, ...) inevitably pulled in by lxsession should have a look at Lumina.</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#039;s a pity, but <strong>LXDE</strong> seems therefore not fitting into the way as desktop-environment. And well: <a href="https://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/a-memory-comparison-of-light-linux-desktops/">https://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/ … -desktops/</a></p><p>Yes, those comparisons are most helpful in the time they were done (the one I&#039;ve found here was done back in 2013). But the generic comparison won&#039;t have changed that much. Especially when looking on the small environments. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2446#p2446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2444#p2444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dikasp2 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>how about lxde or xfce desktop, is there any possibilities to port them into hyperbola 0.4 ?</p></blockquote></div><p>As far as I know, XFCE forces Polkit and needs at least ConsoleKit to make work while i&#039;m not sure about LXDE.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (emulatorman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2444#p2444</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2443#p2443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>So, ALL debian patches are applied to the source code of those packages and later, it is built by the arch PKGBUILD method. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, it is in fact.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Great. I&#039;m in for testing. I&#039;ll keep checking for v0.4 on Downloads page. Hopefully, it would have enough packages such that I move from parabola to hyperbola permanently.</p></blockquote></div><p>Ok, i will let you know when v0.4 is ready to begin make testing.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>If you have some page where you list upcoming packages (which you will be building in the upcoming week) (with versions) to be built, we (community) can build it (write PKGBUILD). I presume currently, there are some dependencies to be built first.</p></blockquote></div><p>Currently we are near (95%) to complete [core], then we need rebuild all xenocara + mesa packages (same version from v0.3). So, under this stage, we should build at least GTK and Qt to begin push the first packages (DEs, WMs, DMs, applications, etc). Anyway, i think a list of packages requested by community should be the way, however those packages should be as lightweight as possible. If there is an option for that which&nbsp; doesn&#039;t force GNU/Linux-based frameworks (D-Bus, logind/ConsoleKit, Polkit, etc) then it can be considered.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (emulatorman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2443#p2443</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2438#p2438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dikasp2 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>how about lxde or xfce desktop, is there any possibilities to port them into hyperbola 0.4 ?</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;m using xfce and would love to see it return, but I&#039;m not optimistic given that the devs haven&#039;t had the resources to keep it up-to-date in 0.3.</p><p>My guess is that if keeping xfce up-to-date for hyperbola was a frictionless task they would already be doing it, and that the refined focus on &quot;lightweight&quot; packages is being done to minimize the amount of maintenance so they can prioritize the work on hyperbolaBSD at the moment.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (christian)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2438#p2438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2436#p2436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>how about lxde or xfce desktop, is there any possibilities to port them into hyperbola 0.4 ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dikasp2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2436#p2436</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2434#p2434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Emulatorman wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>All Debian patches come from debian/patches folder.</p><p>I suppose it should be ready in 2~3 months, it will depend of stability of our new packages and help of community to test our new version when it is available for that.</p></blockquote></div><p>So, ALL debian patches are applied to the source code of those packages and later, it is built by the arch PKGBUILD method. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong.</p><p>Great. I&#039;m in for testing. I&#039;ll keep checking for v0.4 on Downloads page. Hopefully, it would have enough packages such that I move from parabola to hyperbola permanently.</p><p>If you have some page where you list upcoming packages (which you will be building in the upcoming week) (with versions) to be built, we (community) can build it (write PKGBUILD). I presume currently, there are some dependencies to be built first.</p><p>Also, you don&#039;t have to trust the community, you can reject PKGBUILD made by community if you find it strange and unacceptable for Hyperbola&#039;s standards. It will reduce your work and help forming a community.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sagaracharya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2434#p2434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2431#p2431</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>eg. You have patches here in this gnupg-stable prepare function. Where did they come from?</p><p><a href="https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/packages/core.git/tree/gnupg-stable/PKGBUILD">https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/packag … e/PKGBUILD</a></p></blockquote></div><p>All Debian patches come from debian/patches folder. You can search gnupg2 in their package search page -&gt; <a href="https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye&amp;section=all&amp;arch=any&amp;searchon=sourcenames&amp;keywords=gnupg2">https://packages.debian.org/search?suit … rds=gnupg2</a></p><p>Then, download gnupg2_2.2.20-1.debian.tar.xz from <a href="https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/gnupg2">https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/gnupg2</a></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>sagaracharya wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>When will v0.4 be completed for release approximately?</p></blockquote></div><p>I suppose it should be ready in 2~3 months, it will depend of stability of our new packages and help of community to test our new version when it is available for that.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (emulatorman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2431#p2431</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2430#p2430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Emulatorman wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>We won&#039;t support GNOME or wayland in the next version (v0.4) because we are removing all GNU/Linux-based desktop frameworks (ConsoleKit, PolicyKit, D-Bus, systemd, elogind, etc..). Our focus is become a lightweight distro and a BSD descendant operating system (HyperbolaBSD), so our packages in that version will be migrated to BSD-based ones to ease the migration from GNU/Linux to HyperbolaBSD.</p></blockquote></div><p>Sounds fantastic. Please have more packages in hyperbola v0.4. It&#039;s the biggest problem with Hyperbola today.</p><p>I tried to build python-cryptography earlier but I wasn&#039;t able to. My concern was which patches to use. Were the patches made by you yourself or you took it from somewhere?</p><p>eg. You have patches here in this gnupg-stable prepare function. Where did they come from?</p><p><a href="https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/packages/core.git/tree/gnupg-stable/PKGBUILD">https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/packag … e/PKGBUILD</a></p><p>When will v0.4 be completed for release approximately?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sagaracharya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 06:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2430#p2430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2411#p2411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We won&#039;t support GNOME or wayland in the next version (v0.4) because we are removing all GNU/Linux-based desktop frameworks (ConsoleKit, PolicyKit, D-Bus, systemd, elogind, etc..). Our focus is become a lightweight distro and a BSD descendant operating system (HyperbolaBSD), so our packages in that version will be migrated to BSD-based ones to ease the migration from GNU/Linux to HyperbolaBSD.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (emulatorman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2411#p2411</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wayland and gnome-shell support soon?]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2409#p2409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>im not very sure but looks like the hyperbola package search reflects the packages from hyperbola bsd version so there is still many missing unported packages</p><p>you may ask the main developer to confirm this if you curious</p><p>in meantime you can check for yourself the list of all available packages:<br />[stable]<br /><a href="https://repo.hyperbola.info:50012/gnu-plus-linux-libre/stable/sources">https://repo.hyperbola.info:50012/gnu-p … le/sources</a>/<br />[testing]<br /><a href="https://repo.hyperbola.info:50011/gnu-plus-linux-libre/testing/sources/">https://repo.hyperbola.info:50011/gnu-p … g/sources/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dikasp2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2409#p2409</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
