<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — [apache2] Discussion about Webserver and logging]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=444&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2020-12-17T00:08:06Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=444</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[[apache2] Discussion about Webserver and logging]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2555#p2555" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello together, what do you think about the standards of Apache-Webserver logging per default every access on hosted data? I don&#039;t think this was a really good development and decision. So the question is: Should the apache2-package be part of Hyperbola in the future? No, I don&#039;t want to exclude the package. But perhaps it is better to do a research for the best default settings being therefore part of the package, so the webserver can protect the data but also the accessing users when installed?</p><p>The consortium of Apache received 2000 much criticism for releasing a default configuration being not compliant towards the privacy of everybody and so far this did not changed at all. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/sad.png" width="15" height="15" alt="sad" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-12-17T00:08:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=2555#p2555</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
