<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[HyperForum — Flatpak - how to install]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=597</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=597&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Flatpak - how to install.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Flatpak - how to install]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3621#p3621</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello myrcy, the Hyperbola-project <strong>won&#039;t provide support for flatpak at any given time</strong>. The reasoning therefore: It would be a packaging-system within the system package-management itself and out of control for the user what is clearly installed under a free license. It would be therefore possible to construct a usecase where unfree packages, therefore applications and libraries, would be just easy to be installed, which therefore makes the system itself violating the <a href="https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html">FSDG</a>. To quote:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>In particular, a free system distribution should be self-hosting. This means that you must be able to develop and build the system with tools that the system provides you. As a result, a free system distribution cannot include free software that can only be built by using nonfree software.</p></blockquote></div><p>Same for other packaging-systems like npm, cargo, conan, pip and so on from the same reasoning: You would be able to provide unfree packages throughout them. Parabola is a complete different project and system, not to be compared with Hyperbola. <img src="https://forums.hyperbola.info/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /> Their decision to provide support for flatpak, but ours here is to exclude all those further package-management-systems.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (throgh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3621#p3621</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Flatpak - how to install]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3620#p3620</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am aware it is in the Parabola repositories, is there any reason it isn&#039;t in Hyperbola&#039;s?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (myrcy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3620#p3620</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Flatpak - how to install]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3619#p3619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I realize, after migrating Hyperbola does not include Flatpack in the repositories. Is anyone aware of an easy way to install it on Hyperbola?</p><p>Despite its controversial existence to the free software community, it remains a very useful tool to install a lot of FLOSS applications and does not require you to add any of the non-free repositories to use ( install from file ).</p><p>________________</p><p>Thanks for any help you can provide in my attempt to get my flatpack working on Hyperbola.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (myrcy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3619#p3619</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
