<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — Why no qt4-webkit?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=627&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2021-12-16T09:38:16Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=627</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Why no qt4-webkit?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3900#p3900" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Because we have no further application in need for that kind of library and as long as we are not going add, there is no need for this. Quality above quantity. And I speak only for version 0.4 as version 0.3.1 uses another technical aspect for many packages. For version 0.3.1 we have qt5-webkit-ng: <a href="https://www.hyperbola.info/todo/rebuild-packages-with-qt5_webkit_ng/">https://www.hyperbola.info/todo/rebuild … webkit_ng/</a></p><p>The problem here is that the webkit-component has problematic parts in relation towards a free system-distribution. So we cannot add qt4-webkit and as 0.3.1 will become old-stable in the next time we won&#039;t do that also.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-16T09:38:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3900#p3900</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why no qt4-webkit?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3898#p3898" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There is a qt5-webkit but no qt4 version despite the other qt4 packages in the repo.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mesh Malachi]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-16T09:17:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3898#p3898</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
