<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[HyperForum — Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=628&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2021-12-18T11:32:37Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=628</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3907#p3907" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Very interesting. They&#039;re forcing to trust their binary! They should alternatively create something that can be compiled with some C compiler to remove that trust.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sagaracharya]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-18T11:32:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3907#p3907</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3905#p3905" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You need a version of <strong>fpc</strong> to compile <strong>fpc</strong> and therefore create the compiler. Afterwards you have a working package, you can create <strong>ghc</strong> and from that step by step all the rest of Haskell. It is a problematic way because you can download the binary package for <strong>fpc</strong> which is therefore resulting to be done for compilation the first package - for updates it would be done then with the new compiled package in the future going. So also the reasoning until now not integrating that!</p><p>Especially those packages you have mentioned in the first post are the reasoning we have no haskell for now, because the integration is not possible without binary releases and that is a real problem. Parabola GNU/Linux is importing packages from Arch Linux, so they have a starting point. We have this not and it would violate the concept for upcoming releases also. When you start from scratch you will be confronted with the essential problem of <strong>fpc</strong> in some comparable way: Your PKGBUILD would have to contain a binary-release of it to compile it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-17T21:36:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3905#p3905</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3904#p3904" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>throgh wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>So you have to work up the whole stack from the ground.</p></blockquote></div><p>What do you mean by that? </p><p>Is it something like the compiler written in C which can self-compile? I don&#039;t even know how self-compiling would work the 1st time unless the binary has been made by hand.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sagaracharya]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-17T12:19:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3904#p3904</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3903#p3903" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Own perspective: You need <strong>fpc</strong> and to build that you need <strong>fpc</strong> - again as binary-package. So you have to work up the whole stack from the ground. We have integrated <strong>fpc</strong> not for now!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[throgh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=347</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-17T11:16:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3903#p3903</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Starting packaging haskell stack]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3902#p3902" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Some genius has written the PKGBUILDs (at Parabola) for haskell stack</p><p>ghc-static depends on ghc<br />ghc depends on ghc-libs<br />ghc-libs depends on ghc-static (makedepend)</p><p>Where to start packaging haskell stack? Should I create PKGBUILD from scratch?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sagaracharya]]></name>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-12-17T10:43:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=3902#p3902</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
