<![CDATA[HyperForum — fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]>2023-03-09T07:11:05ZPunBBhttps://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=822<![CDATA[Re: fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]>It seems that fwknop does provide CMD_CYCLE_OPEN which is a feature to allow fwknopd to interact with firewalls or ACL’s that are not natively supported. This option is used as a workaround in openwrt: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/fwknop-port … n/149319/3]]>2023-03-09T07:11:05Zhttps://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5836#p5836<![CDATA[Re: fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]>As Hyperbola is not supporting iptables the question would be: Is it possible to be used instead with nftables? Otherwise there won't be any support possible.]]>https://forums.hyperbola.info/profile.php?id=3472023-03-07T10:48:14Zhttps://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5817#p5817<![CDATA[fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]>Hi all,
Please excuse me if this is the wrong place to ask this question. I was wondering if you have any plans to include fwknop (SPA encryption) in your package offerings. Thanks in advance. ' https://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/