<![CDATA[HyperForum — fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]> https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?id=822 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 07:11:05 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]> https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5836#p5836 It seems that fwknop does provide CMD_CYCLE_OPEN which is a feature to allow fwknopd to interact with firewalls or ACL’s that are not natively supported.  This option is used as a workaround in openwrt:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/fwknop-port … n/149319/3

]]> Thu, 09 Mar 2023 07:11:05 +0000 https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5836#p5836 <![CDATA[Re: fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]> https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5817#p5817 As Hyperbola is not supporting iptables the question would be: Is it possible to be used instead with nftables? Otherwise there won't be any support possible.

]]> Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:48:14 +0000 https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5817#p5817 <![CDATA[fwknop (SPA) single packet authorization]]> https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5816#p5816 Hi all,

  Please excuse me if this is the wrong place to ask this question.
  I was wondering if you have any plans to include fwknop (SPA encryption) in your package offerings.
  Thanks in advance.
'
https://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/

]]> Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:20:12 +0000 https://forums.hyperbola.info/viewtopic.php?pid=5816#p5816