1 (edited by throgh 2019-11-12 08:57:41)

Topic: Unneeded discussions regarding Hyperbola

Well, it seems some people just tend to disagree and play their own "campaign" against Hyperbola. Instead of the wording Live and let live! it is just again more of the same reading: Accusations for having Hyperbola taking a snapshot from Arch Linux and enforcing their software onto users. And I find this very disrespectful, a subjective view from my side:

  • Hyperbola took just one snapshot back in 2017 nothing more nothing less and other distributions do this also taking from Debian or Ubuntu. What message is this? Just some kind of paraphrasing strawman because comparing those distributions is a big fail about the different approaches.

  • Exactly where is the way to enforce anything? Hyperbola is using OpenRC for now and there are plans to integrate more INIT-systems in the upcoming version 0.4 - looking here for s6 and here for shepherd. And this discussion is absolutely nonsense, even those INIT-systems are not integrated with version 0.4. By the way: Does anybody enforce the usage of Hyperbola? No, but it is just ONE distribution besides Parabola and Dragora onto the FSF-endorsed distributions using another INIT-system - having gnewsense outside because of unknown state and further planning.

  • The team behind is doing a very good job with own visions and there is nothing wrong to remove identified packages or integrate alternatives like LibreSSL, Xenocara and sndio. Even this is one outstanding position when looking after most other distributions just using the known framework consisting of systemd, dbus and pulseaudio. So what's the problem about having an own vision? Remembering even here: This was just one, initial snapshot and since this point many things were changed.

  • Freedom and privacy are not just a playground and a little game where to decide what is fitting and what is not. Many projects tend more and more just into the direction of being generic "open-source" which is the opposite free software and when this is named attacks will emerge immediately. What kind of childish game is this? Having problems or criticism with Hyperbola? Name it here for discussion and feedback instead doing it from comments and postings under articles and forum-threads elsewhere. Gnome is integrating proprietary services for example. That's no theory it is reality! Or is it about giveaway of freedom regarding the pragmatic approach and pricing?

In the end those criticicism or better to call attacks are just not needed. I've got it so far: Some people just don't want to hear and read about alternatives, getting really personal instead of being most objective about it. And this cannot be the way about software-freedom, acting like there cannot be alternatives, reducing the works of others, of even whole communities. Where is the problem? Just follow Live and let live! instead those harsh attacks and simplifications. There are people here not willing to follow the major way of systemd and corporations behind the generic Linux-kernel. You don't want to hear about this? Fine, ignoring is okay but the reduction of outstanding work being done is just impolite. wink
Free culture is about acceptance and not some agenda regarding pragmatism: Mozilla has more than just one problem regarding privacy? Red Hat has another own vision about GNU/Linux? And we should not forget about Oracle or Microsoft doing the same. Yes, removing Java, removing Mono is needed because they are not independent and ignoring all those first named issues is a leftover for further questions. Just talking about free culture is therefore all around this: Being mostly objective, reading through information given and then talk about.

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

2 (edited by zapper 2019-11-12 02:45:28)

Re: Unneeded discussions regarding Hyperbola

Yes, it is definitely true...

People are not reading the wiki or the todo list and don't understand the reasons given for why packages are being removed...

Also, straight forks just suck. Deblobbing and no other changes = crap.

But yeah, the changes made to Hyperbola are pretty awesome. I am tired of corporations and I don't want them to control everything to do with linux.  I knew home was bad of course, but I didn't realize they were pushing proprietary crap. Well, unless systemd is considered proprietary... its license isn't proprietary, though its purpose is the same sadly... in a more creative yet destructive way.

Redhat and corporations like it, need to be more respectful and keep their hands off of gnu/linux and such, at least when it comes to breaking backwards compatibility and making bloated software. If they want to make stuff, fine... but don't overengineer it so that you are corrupting a good idea with your filth...

All in all I agree with you.  Security and Freedom are only being followed by a select few distros... ;/

Hyperbola:

The Stable Secure Libre Arch!

3

Re: Unneeded discussions regarding Hyperbola

zapper wrote:

Yes, it is definitely true...



People are not reading the wiki or the todo list and don't understand the reasons given for why packages are being removed...



Also, straight forks just suck. Deblobbing and no other changes = crap.



But yeah, the changes made to Hyperbola are pretty awesome. I am tired of corporations and I don't want them to control everything to do with linux.  I knew home was bad of course, but I didn't realize they were pushing proprietary crap. Well, unless systemd is considered proprietary... its license isn't proprietary, though its purpose is the same sadly... in a more creative yet destructive way.



Redhat and corporations like it, need to be more respectful and keep their hands off of gnu/linux and such, at least when it comes to breaking backwards compatibility and making bloated software. If they want to make stuff, fine... but don't overengineer it so that you are corrupting a good idea with your filth...



All in all I agree with you.  Security and Freedom are only being followed by a select few distros... ;/



The problem at all is the criticism brought up towards Hyperbola and the vision behind: Some people throw this into one general point being to radical. Others brought up that whole programming languages will be removed (nodejs, Java etc.). And then there is also the date of some packages. But the question is: Why just criticism without discussions here in the forums? No real feedback. And I don't want to compare the different distributions, but I find the whole behavior just unfriendly and impolite, I don't even understand it because Hyperbola has just a complete other vision and setup in comparison of other distributions and therefore no need for such attacking in general. hmm

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

4

Re: Unneeded discussions regarding Hyperbola

Well it is mostly because lots of people that criticize have got limited or no brains at all...
And it is who linux users are these days as well, they can only criticize and nothing else
People who can only take and give nothng in return are just as useless.

5 (edited by throgh 2020-03-16 00:18:43)

Re: Unneeded discussions regarding Hyperbola

Please stop speaking about "usage" of human beings, that's not helping and I deny to say that people are useless (we are not talking about "objects" and human beings should not and never be compared to that or even put into stereotypes or labels like "useful" or "useless" - that's very impolite in the end and misanthropic), but the problem stays: It is the ignorance in general instead of acceptance having colourful environments. This would be possible with GNU/Linux and with BSD-derivates. Building an own operating-system, optimized for the concurrent workflow as you wish. But it is also about the feelings coming up with havng the knowledge to build and modify the personalized operating system: Not being chosen, just to spread knowledge, spread the sources and of course give more insights into the system. Not talking about videos on proprietary platforms like YouTube. More talking about real help having older equipment refreshed, showing that there is no need for buying the newest hardware. There are so many aspects about this kind of discussion, starting with labeling of others and ending with very dark, sinister thoughts while people having big problems with freedom, privacy and many more these days.

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!