Topic: Arch Linux's "AUR" OS repository have malware
According to the Linux news, the Arch Linux OS repository have recent user-defined uploads as malware. Sources state that Arch doesn't vet the uploads so its OS repository relies on community activity. Some say that more malware was uploaded after clearing the first malware batch.
For Arch users, I assume that a degree of diligence is required when it comes to installing programs. I assume that practice is verification before compiling the source code. A straight software installation from the OS repository is a blind check. The server have some questionable protocols that might as well jeopardize Arch into Windows or iPod Apple store.
I know that Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre is regarded as a different OS from Arch Linux, but I can't shake the feeling that it uses some of its design. Can anyone ensure that a vetting process is in effect for any file uploads/edits in the Hyperbola OS repository? Furthermore, if Hyperbola does derive from Arch, does that mean there is a risk to unknowingly extract malware as a base for software on other Arch-like OS? If Hyperbola does indeed find itself at risk from derivation, it is a understandable move to develop HyperbolaBSD. And what about the Arch users, where should they go? I hope that they look forward to Hyperbola (while I can't vouch for encryption options, I can attest that Windows XP on a 32bit machine would be on a similar encryption level), but I suppose Parabola would suffice for their taste.
As they say, it is nigh time to abandon ship, the Arch ship, that is.
Cited references:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/s … t-malware/