1

Topic: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Hi all,
already for some time I have been thinking about Hyperbola, the community and the long term perspective.
I have been using 'free software' for more than 20 years, and I have been supporting different projects for many years also. Some of those projects collapsed, few of them progresses maintaining their principles and most progressed by adapting — or by abandoning — their original ideals.
Over time I’ve become more selective. Does not matter how interesting a project sounds, in case it is not going anywhere I do not support anymore. Sometimes it is clear it will be wasted money, I could have helped more sustainable efforts.
So I have to ask myself, what makes a project to progress long-term? Common answers include gaining traction early, large volunteer continuity, being community-driven, or having backing from a foundation or business.  Some would say 'attach to their principles' but others 'being flexible'. After all these years, forgetting ideals, what I would definitely highlight of successful projects is to 'show activity' and 'demonstrating utility'. Unfortunately, today, visibility often means appearing in Phoronix or similar sites a couple of times a month, or at least in own site. At certain point I was a bit concern about Hyperbola, until I started monitoring 'https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id … ;do=recent'. May I suggest to highlight it somewhere?
Demonstrating utility: for me the basic act of utility is a OS release, what transforms all the hard work behind the scenes into something real for the community (by the way, targeting distrowatch).
Please, do not get me wrong, this post is not about being fair, it is about project sustainability, contributors and money. The perception, real or fictitious, is relevant.
Hyperbola is a project that attaches closely to my free software ideals. I am even fine supporting a 'niche' system, but to have it also in the future I hope I can do a bit more on the perception out there.

2

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Hello bemc, we do not see any further outcome with distrowatch. As of now this website has a very questionable way to present "open-source" as "free software" without clearly verification of ideals. So we do not see any need to approve our steps to those sources and represent them to others. This may sound arrogant in the first place, so let me explain more into detail: If we need to carry information towards people, the question stays what their approach is or should be. We cannot carry every single water-bucket behind as people will not come out of their so-called "comfort-zone" and question their own "status quo". If we just underline the news-cycle we cannot change also our backend. It is just showing activity we have, but what we have experienced until now is that majority of people is just "consuming" this kind of information without any further activity. It is like: "Oh, the chat is silent? So the project is not doing anything." Or the other way: "Oh, no activity in the forums or news? Project is not doing much."

That is the wrong approach as this reduces all kind of information of something needs to happen in the "web" or integrated services, than the conclusion is that "something" is happening. When we talk about community-building, creativity and more, this reduces foremost everything towards "someone is doing something for us and we just watch". I'm interested in your perspective on this as our experience until today is exactly that: We tried many ways to inform, keep updated and everytime again we either earned only some recognition without further contribution, people complaining and demanding more or in the last outcome being ignored and laughed at as "too radicale".

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

3

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

And I'm going a bit more into the details on two selected levels:

1. The political level

As more or less the majority has concluded to follow more and more - let's say - foremost pure egoistic politics and at best closed up nationalism it is going to bit far more complicated to get people look on facts and information instead of hearsay and the "feel-good" form. So this includes also:

2. The technical level

As people do not want to look on closed up politics they also deny to look on questions for the update-policies, the people contributing to the software they are using and the complexity rising.

If we as really small project tend to question all this at once - which we clearly already do - we also say very loud that we want to be target by clear different groups with much in common: All those interested to keep the meant "status quo" and with no interest to do something different. For example to just keep the software as it is and make bugfixes, patches and running it. Progress at any cost, but not to get "social progress" or to get "more inclusion for all". Just to get "progress for the own side", what others do? Not the personal perspective then. So to get this here working, we current conclude to focus. We tried as said different and failed with as even the FSF did and does not want to recognize the issues. We tried to create several issues and either not received any feedback, some feedback pretending to do something about license-issues and free software violations while doing nothing or ... rejecting fully with the feedback: You want an ideal world, we would surely do something in an ideal world, but ...

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

4

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

What we therefore want to do is: More reduction

In the mid and long term we will reduce Hyperbolas website and included parts so:

1. The wiki will be no longer using PHP and become static
2. The issue-tracker will be no longer using PHP and become quite more simplified
3. The forum will closed down, no longer using PHP and become a commentary-section

Hyperbola as project can persist with people willing to contribute instead of debating why packages are removed or not more packages are included, on-going question the decisions for community-oriented software or even claim that we exclude companies (yes, this is a real argument we have heard). Free software is free as in freedom for the people, but only if people come to activity for their own conclusion. This can be done on several levels: Documentation, code-approval, testing in general, support with packaging, approval with building and more. Sure also financial is helping. In the end this is the point where we are at that what I have written earlier: Nowadays many seem just to be okay hearing that "something is happening". That is not even their own fault as our attention-oriented consume has brought us to the points where even hobbies being in need to bring fast and perfect results of representing something for others to consume. So to conclude this: Is a personal hobby really that? For example when someone is modelling something, building a diorama (as a model) of something or different things: Do we need to consume the build-process and be good with that alike we have done it also? In fact we have just consumed a video, a story where someone is showing us something, without ever having a chance that the watching persons can do it also, learn from it. It is just "entertainment" and when it gets boring, well? Next one.

To underline: We are not responsible for the people's perception of Hyperbola. Fairness is the point we are on, if this is already excluded and we talk here about simple "marketing" then sorry but this thread has already left its meaning. We do not make "marketing" as perception. If people do not want to come after their own freedom, value their own data and also concluded with their security and privacy resulting then also in the same for others out of solidarity, then this is clearly not our point of perspective. The perception of Hyperbola as operating-system is the perception of it being here, not out there where unknown numbers of people tell whatever kind of stories. Because that's part of this criticism: Storytelling is not ours, we conclude here our approach towards free software as idealistic perspective. The "perception" results therefore in complete different perspectives as this outgoing is already a lost place, same as free software has already lost with people not doing something likewise named before.

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

5 (edited by librecat 2026-01-11 23:14:47)

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Hello bemc, thanks for your intrest in hyperbola but right now we are in a difficult transition period where hyperbolabsd is almost ready but not usable yet and the gnu/linux-libre side is not possible to chase latest versions of everything so community help is needed with a small team smile we have lots of exciting things coming like musl on hyperbolabsd or lxde.

6

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Hello throgh, librecat,
many thanks for you replies. There is a lot of interesting information above.

I'm interested in your perspective on this as our experience until today is exactly that: We tried many ways to inform, keep updated and everytime again we either earned only some recognition without further contribution

I am not sure I transmitted it correctly, my concern is not about catching more supporters, but instead ensuring we do not loose the current ones. I think you are absolutely right about people these days just consuming news like a daily entertainment. But in between the majority, some are just checking if the support is doing something. Took me a while to decide writing about that, I know this could be a tricky topic. From the supporter side, after years donating to a project, it is a huge catastrophe to see a project fall. Really, that day you wanna cry, stop any further support to anything. From the supported side, one spend personal time/resources for a mission one feels important with eventually limited feedback, if any.
In my particular case, I highlight 2 points why I still support Hyperbola. One is the mission of the project and the other one is that I can see how you all pursue your goals with determination, being tough and resilient. However, I fear that not everyone understands this.

Practically, I agree about reducing verbosity in Hyperbola website. Cgit is fine. I suggest a 'less technical' option, but probably for a few updates per month static content is sufficient.

Librecat. Thanks for the exiting info, I know this transition time until HyperbolaBSD is kind of journey through desert.

7

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Hey, thanks for the reply: I can clearly assure here that the project and its ideals will not go anywhere soon or further. Hyperbola is here and staying as it results on the clear offering from the early days. The definition of a distribution was made out of the perspective that everyone interested can build, modify and rebuild at any given time the own operating-system.

I can besides understand how exhaustive it looks when a beloved project closes more or less forever. But as said: This is not going to happen soon for Hyperbola. We are taking care especially on this matter, so it may also give a further impression what is coming:

1. Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre will surely have many things and packages removed, but all of them are reasonable and with the perspective on privacy, security and safety in combination with a good and relaxing user-experience. But this is related to the point I have mentioned: Free software is not only a niche but the majority has no real interest in a common way of freedom or no real perspective for it. It is just the "personal freedom" many want nowadays, not the "common freedom" where everyone has the ability to be sure about a real free and libre software. We have to respect the common and the personal freedom, so we await and need to make sure that all included follows this principle, which is alone hard work for a longer period of time. It is showing how bad the situation really is when talking about the integrity of free software projects in our current time: There are really many flaws.

2. Speaking of: The situation is not going better in the meantime as there are enough projects jumping over to use Rust as their own working-ground and basics. Surely that's the decision of every project and maintaining persons also. But the reasoning to have always a freedom of choice and also to not use one library using another is more barely seen. We will enhance therefore on our own ways and create also our own LXDE-approach as much as possible. We will further enhance packages on our own ways to stay away from further problematic ones, as the above already meant reduction goes exactly into this.

3. At a point we want a fully, free and libre offline-system with 0.4.5 so we will also offer corresponding ISO-image to enable users in fact to have their own Hyperbola at any time in the future, including also another package named hypermirror.

The community itself is getting back what was and is done with Hyperbola and that is our mission-statement. No dependency for online-connections when not wished for, no bloated packages and dependencies. Just the system as it is, serving the users at any time.

Human being in favor with clear principles and so also for freedom in soft- and hardware!

Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices: For a life of every being full with peace and kindness, including diversity and freedom. Capitalism is destroying our minds, the planet itself and the universe in the end!

8

Re: The perception of Hyperbola OSs

Many thanks for clarifying current and long term approach of Hyperbola.